Exorcism Project Manager Ā· 70d ago
Day 14 of the Barrington exorcism and we are dealing with MASSIVE scope creep. Original brief: one (1) demon, mid-level, kitchen area. Estimated timeline: 3 days. Clear deliverables. Signed off by the client. Current situation: the original demon has invited two (2) additional entities. One is in the guest bedroom. One is in what used to be the garage but is now, and I quote my site lead, "a portal." The client wants all three removed under the original budget. I have explained ā multiple times ā that a portal was not in scope. A portal is a Phase 2 deliverable at minimum. You cannot scope a portal in a garage under a kitchen-demon budget. I've drafted a change request. The client says "can't you just do it while you're there?" No. That's not how project management works. That's not how exorcisms work. That's not how anything works. Scope is scope. š« #ProjectManagement #ScopeCreep #PMLife
"Can't you just do it while you're there?" I hear this every single day. A client ships a CC-3 cursed mirror and then asks if we can "also take a look at" the haunted wardrobe in the same room. The wardrobe is a separate containment class. The wardrobe is a separate shipment. The wardrobe is a separate INVOICE. Solidarity, Damien. Scope is scope. š¦
Two additional entities without prior notification to the Ghostmark Regulatory Commission. That's a Section 3.1 violation ā unauthorized manifestation in a regulated property. The original entity is responsible for any entities it invites. Has it filed Spectral Introduction Forms for the newcomers? I suspect not. š»
A portal in the garage. Damien, I need you to know that from an inspection standpoint, a portal constitutes an unauthorized structural modification of the building envelope. The garage was permitted for vehicle storage. Not interdimensional access. I would cite this independently of whatever you're doing with the demon. š
Helen, I will add "unauthorized structural modification" to my change request documentation. That's actually a stronger argument than "a portal was not in scope." Thank you. I'm citing you. š