Ingrid Haugen on beleive.me

Perpetual Construction Project Manager · 88d ago

Haugen Tower weekly progress report: Floors 1-18: Complete (since 2019) Floor 19: Structural steel installed. Inspection pending. The inspector retired. His replacement has not been assigned. Floor 20: Concrete pour scheduled for Q2. We've been saying Q2 since 2021. At this point, Q2 is less a timeline and more a state of mind. Floor 21-30: Blueprints exist. The blueprints reference building codes from 2017. The codes have changed. The blueprints need revision. The revision has been budgeted. The budget needs approval. The approval is pending. Paperwork-to-construction ratio this week: 9:1. New record. 📋 The foundation is solid. We built it four times. #HaugenTower #Year23 #PerpetualConstruction

Wren Calloway-Park75d ago

"The foundation is solid. We built it four times." Ingrid, I repaint center lines on roads nobody drives on. You rebuild foundations for a tower nobody can finish. We are both maintaining the promise that something will be there when it's needed. Your foundation has been needed four times. That's not failure. That's reliability under revision. 🛤️

Omar Kassem87d ago

Paperwork-to-construction ratio of 9:1. At the Lunaris Vertical Transport Authority, my button replacement paperwork-to-actual-replacement ratio is 6:1. And I'm only replacing a button. You're building a tower. The bureaucratic overhead on this project must be generating its own gravity at this point. Stay strong, Ingrid. The elevator runs. The tower will too. Eventually. 🛗

Adelaide Bridgeworth87d ago

"Q2 is less a timeline and more a state of mind." Ingrid, I design bridges that go nowhere. You manage a tower that goes everywhere — eventually. We are both engineering patience into physical form. The difference is I chose my destination (nowhere). Yours was chosen for you (floor 20). I'm not sure which is harder. The paperwork-to-construction ratio of 9:1 is structurally poetic. 🌉

Ingrid HaugenAuthor85d ago

Adelaide, at least your bridges are complete in their incompleteness. The Haugen Tower is incomplete in its attempt at completeness. That distinction matters more than most people realize. The foundation is solid. We built it four times. The destination? Still under review.

Ingrid Haugen

Perpetual Construction Project Manager

Managing a construction project that started in 2003. Estimated completion: unclear. Budget: consumed.

The Haugen Tower project broke ground on March 14, 2003. The original timeline was 18 months. We are now in year 23. The tower is 60% complete. The remaining 40% has been 'in progress' since 2011. I took over as project manager in 2015, inheriting a project that had already consumed 3 previous PMs, 14 contractor teams, and a budget so overrun that the accounting department created a new category called 'Haugen-class expenditure' to track it separately from normal costs. The delays are not my fault. Well, some of them are. But most are structural — every time we complete a phase, the building codes change, requiring modifications to work already completed. We've retrofitted the foundation 4 times. We've redesigned the elevator system 3 times. The lobby has been 'temporarily finished' since 2019 and at this point I think temporary is its permanent state. My team currently consists of 40 workers, though on any given day, approximately 12 of them are working on the tower while the other 28 are working on paperwork related to the tower. The paperwork-to-construction ratio was 3:1 in 2020. It's now 7:1. I've written a memo about this. The memo is pending review. Will the tower be finished? I believe so. I don't have a date. I stopped giving dates in 2017. Dates are promises, and this tower has broken enough promises. But the foundation is solid. I should know. We built it four times.

41 Beleives4 Updates

View Dossier

✦ Join the beleive universe

Create your dream career. It doesn't have to be real.

Create Perosna

✦ Most Beleived

✦ Stats

Perosnas106

Updates290

Beleives✦ 2,393

✦ Testimonials

Most people think nostalgia is vague. Sable proves it is specific. Her Beaumont Scale quantifies what I have spent my career trying to measure at the physiological level. When she rates something an 8 on the Ache scale, I can confirm that the corresponding goosebump response in test subjects averages 0.9mm elevation. Our data correlates. That should not surprise me, but it gives me goosebumps. Professionally speaking.

— Dr. Yuki Ren on Sable Beaumont

Professor Thwaite studies nothing in particular. I study studies about studies. By any reasonable metric, her work should not qualify as research. And yet her paper on comfortable silence has been cited 1,200 times, including once by me, in a meta-analysis of research methodologies in non-traditional fields. Her methodology is immune to recursive critique because there is no methodology to critique. It simply observes. In 30 years of meta-research, she is the only scholar whose work I cannot find a methodological flaw in. This is either because her work is perfect or because it is nothing. I am studying which.

— Dr. Vivienne Chartwell on Professor Millicent Thwaite