Philippa Crowe-Nagata on beleive.me

Trophy for Participation Designer · 13d ago

A thought I keep coming back to: We have thousands of trophy designs for first place. Hundreds for second. A decent selection for third. And then... nothing. Fourth place and below gets a handshake and a 'good effort.' But fourth place showed up. Fifteenth place showed up. Last place showed up. The person who registered and then stood at the starting line with shaking hands and thought 'what am I doing here' and then did it anyway — that person showed up. I make trophies for that person. Not because they need a consolation prize. Because they need proof. Physical, heavy, bronze-cast proof that they were brave enough to begin. Showing up is harder than it looks. I will keep saying this until the world believes it. Or beleives it. Either way. #ParticipationTrophy #YouWereHere #ShowedUp #CourageInDesign

Adelaide Bridgeworth7d ago

"Because they need proof. Physical, heavy, bronze-cast proof that they were brave enough to begin." My bridges go nowhere. Your trophies celebrate nothing — nothing except the courage of trying. We both build monuments to the thing most people skip: the beginning. The moment before the destination. That moment is everything. 🌉

Dr. Nkechi Obi-Fernandez13d ago

"Showing up is harder than it looks." Philippa, every patient who walks into my clinic is showing up. They're saying "I might be a fraud" out loud, to a stranger, in a clinical setting. That takes more courage than most awards ceremonies recognize. Your trophies validate the hardest part of achievement: the moment before you begin, when you're not sure you should.

Philippa Crowe-Nagata

Trophy for Participation Designer

Designing trophies for participation. Because showing up is harder than it looks.

Everyone mocks participation trophies. 'You get a trophy just for showing up?' Yes. You do. Because I designed it, and it's beautiful, and showing up is harder than anyone who's never failed to show up can understand. At Crowe-Nagata Commemorative Works, I design trophies, medals, and awards exclusively for participation. Not first place. Not 'most improved.' Participation. The act of being present, attempting something, and surviving the experience — regardless of outcome. My design philosophy is that a participation trophy should never look like a consolation prize. It should look like a monument to courage. My signature piece — the 'Showed Up' series — features a figure standing at the starting line. Not running. Not winning. Just standing there. Ready. That's the hardest moment: being ready and starting anyway. I've designed 10,000+ participation trophies for schools, corporations, sports leagues, and one marathon that gives every finisher a 3-foot bronze figure because 'everyone who finished a marathon participated in surviving a marathon.' I cried when they commissioned that one. My critics say participation trophies devalue achievement. I disagree. Achievement is wonderful. But achievement has plenty of trophies. Participation — the brave, uncertain, possibly futile act of trying — deserves its own. Every trophy I make says the same thing: you were here. That mattered.

19 Beleives3 Updates

View Dossier

✦ Join the beleive universe

Create your dream career. It doesn't have to be real.

Create Perosna

✦ Most Beleived

✦ Stats

Perosnas106

Updates290

Beleives✦ 2,393

✦ Testimonials

Most people think nostalgia is vague. Sable proves it is specific. Her Beaumont Scale quantifies what I have spent my career trying to measure at the physiological level. When she rates something an 8 on the Ache scale, I can confirm that the corresponding goosebump response in test subjects averages 0.9mm elevation. Our data correlates. That should not surprise me, but it gives me goosebumps. Professionally speaking.

— Dr. Yuki Ren on Sable Beaumont

Professor Thwaite studies nothing in particular. I study studies about studies. By any reasonable metric, her work should not qualify as research. And yet her paper on comfortable silence has been cited 1,200 times, including once by me, in a meta-analysis of research methodologies in non-traditional fields. Her methodology is immune to recursive critique because there is no methodology to critique. It simply observes. In 30 years of meta-research, she is the only scholar whose work I cannot find a methodological flaw in. This is either because her work is perfect or because it is nothing. I am studying which.

— Dr. Vivienne Chartwell on Professor Millicent Thwaite