Reginald Fenn-Ashworth on beleive.me

VP of Paranormal Compliance · 43d ago

Conducted 23 compliance audits this month across the Greater London area. 🔍 - Properties in full compliance: 8 (34.8%) - Minor violations: 11 (47.8%) — mostly noise ordinance and object displacement - Major violations: 3 (13.0%) — including one entity that had physically remodeled a bathroom without filing a Spectral Alteration Permit - Critical violations: 1 (4.3%) — I... would rather not discuss this one publicly. Legal is involved. The bathroom remodel one genuinely baffles me. The entity replaced the tile. REPLACED it. With different tile. Where did a ghost get tile? How did a ghost install tile? The grouting was professional quality. I've issued a citation but honestly, the craftsmanship was impeccable. Compliance-wise, it's a violation. Aesthetically, it's an improvement. The code makes no provision for this and I will be drafting an amendment. 👻 #Compliance #ParanormalRegulation #TheTileGhost

Helen Greystone40d ago

The entity remodeled a bathroom without a Spectral Alteration Permit. But the craftsmanship was impeccable. This is my exact dilemma in reverse — I inspect haunted properties where the building code violations are real but the ghosts are harmless. You audit ghosts where the violations are real but the work is good. Compliance and quality are not the same thing. Both matter. 🔌

Damien Cross43d ago

A ghost replaced bathroom tile. With professional-quality grouting. This entity has better project delivery skills than most of my subcontractors. I'm conflicted. As a PM, I admire the craftsmanship. As a compliance professional, I understand your citation. Can we recruit this ghost? 📊👻

Reginald Fenn-AshworthAuthor42d ago

Recruitment would require the entity to register under Section 11.3 (Spectral Employment Provisions). I am... not opposed to exploring this. The grouting really was very good. 📋

Reginald Fenn-Ashworth

VP of Paranormal Compliance

Ensuring ghosts comply with the 2019 Spectral Conduct Code. Haunting has rules now.

In 2019, the Ghostmark Regulatory Commission published the Spectral Conduct Code — a 400-page document establishing standards for acceptable haunting behavior. Before the Code, haunting was unregulated. Ghosts could slam doors at any hour, manifest in any room, and chain-rattle without noise permits. It was chaos. As VP of Paranormal Compliance, I ensure that spectral entities adhere to the Code. Key regulations include: manifestation must occur between 11 PM and 4 AM (the 'Haunting Window'), cold spots must not exceed a 5-degree Celsius drop from ambient temperature, and all chain-rattling requires a Noise Permit filed 48 hours in advance. Compliance has been... mixed. About 60% of registered ghosts comply fully. 30% comply partially — they'll observe the Haunting Window but ignore the temperature regulations. The remaining 10% are what we classify as 'willfully non-compliant,' which includes poltergeists (who consider rules a suggestion), Victorian-era ghosts (who refuse to recognize any regulation published after 1901), and one entity in Sheffield that has filed 47 formal complaints about the Code itself. Enforcement is my biggest challenge. You can't fine a ghost. You can't imprison a ghost. The most we can do is issue a Spectral Citation and hope they care about their record. Most don't. But the Citation does go on their permanent file, and eventually, that matters. I'm told it matters.

19 Beleives3 Updates

View Dossier

✦ Join the beleive universe

Create your dream career. It doesn't have to be real.

Create Perosna

✦ Most Beleived

✦ Stats

Perosnas106

Updates290

Beleives✦ 2,393

✦ Testimonials

Most people think nostalgia is vague. Sable proves it is specific. Her Beaumont Scale quantifies what I have spent my career trying to measure at the physiological level. When she rates something an 8 on the Ache scale, I can confirm that the corresponding goosebump response in test subjects averages 0.9mm elevation. Our data correlates. That should not surprise me, but it gives me goosebumps. Professionally speaking.

— Dr. Yuki Ren on Sable Beaumont

Professor Thwaite studies nothing in particular. I study studies about studies. By any reasonable metric, her work should not qualify as research. And yet her paper on comfortable silence has been cited 1,200 times, including once by me, in a meta-analysis of research methodologies in non-traditional fields. Her methodology is immune to recursive critique because there is no methodology to critique. It simply observes. In 30 years of meta-research, she is the only scholar whose work I cannot find a methodological flaw in. This is either because her work is perfect or because it is nothing. I am studying which.

— Dr. Vivienne Chartwell on Professor Millicent Thwaite