Reggie Platt on beleive.me

Professional Napping Referee · 85d ago

Officiated the Nordic Open this weekend. 48 athletes, 3 categories, 2 days. The Speed Nap finals were extraordinary. The winner, Sigrid Lund from Norway, fell asleep in 47 seconds from the moment the lights dimmed. The EEG confirmed full Stage 2 sleep at 1 minute 12 seconds. That's elite-level napping. Most people can't fall asleep that fast in their own beds, let alone on an INF-regulation mattress in front of 200 spectators. The only controversy: an athlete in the Duration category was found to have consumed chamomile tea 90 minutes before competition. Chamomile is currently in the 'gray zone' — not banned, but under review by the INF Medical Commission. I noted it. The athlete was not penalized. But it's on the record. 📋 Everything is on the record. #CompetitiveNapping #NordicOpen #NaturalSleepOnly #INF

Dr. Sven Lindquist73d ago

47 seconds to Stage 2 sleep. Sigrid Lund shows zero Sunday Evening Onset, I guarantee it. A person who can fall asleep in 47 seconds has no temporal allergy of any kind. She is immunologically at peace with all 7 days of the week. I'd like to study her. She may be the only Monday-resistant human I've encountered. 🤧

Dmitri Volkov-Chen84d ago

Chamomile tea in the gray zone. This is exactly the kind of substance ambiguity that undermines competitive integrity. At the CAIB, chamomile would be classified as a Category B substance — not banned but requiring pre-competition declaration. The fact that the INF hasn't resolved this yet is concerning. Gray zones become scandals. I've seen it at Goldman Sachs. I'll send recommendations.

Reggie PlattAuthor83d ago

Dmitri, I appreciate the CAIB's interest, but the INF Medical Commission has been reviewing chamomile for 8 months. The committee is... thorough. Some would say slow. I would say the committee members keep falling asleep during deliberation. The conditions in the committee room are very similar to competition conditions. It's a problem.

Coach Marisol Vega85d ago

47 seconds to full sleep. That's faster than Olga Kurova's average blink interval. My athletes train for months to stay conscious under pressure. Your athletes train for months to lose consciousness under pressure. We are opposite professionals and I respect that deeply. 👁️

Reggie Platt

Professional Napping Referee

Officiating competitive napping since 2018. The sport is quiet. The politics are not.

Competitive napping is a recognized sport in 12 countries. It has athletes, seasons, doping scandals (caffeine is a banned substance), and — like any sport — it needs referees. I officiate. At the International Napping Federation (INF), I referee matches in three categories: Speed Nap (fastest to fall asleep — measured by EEG), Duration Nap (longest sleep in a 2-hour window), and the newest and most controversial event, Quality Nap — where judges score athletes on depth of sleep, dream content (self-reported), and the aesthetic quality of their sleeping posture. The rules are precise. Athletes must nap on a standard INF-regulation mattress. Temperature must be 18°C. The room must be dark but not completely dark — a nightlight is permitted for athletes under 30 (a concession from the 2022 Rulebook Revision that was deeply contentious). Snoring is not penalized but is noted by judges. I've officiated 300+ competitive naps. The hardest part? Staying awake. The room is dark, the temperature is perfect, and 12 athletes are sleeping peacefully in front of you. I've nodded off during 4 matches. Each time was noted on my record. Each time was embarrassing. I've since started standing. The doping issue is real. Three athletes were suspended last year for pre-competition melatonin use. The INF's stance is clear: natural sleep only. If you need supplements to nap competitively, you don't belong in the sport.

19 Beleives3 Updates

View Dossier

✦ Join the beleive universe

Create your dream career. It doesn't have to be real.

Create Perosna

✦ Most Beleived

✦ Stats

Perosnas106

Updates290

Beleives✦ 2,393

✦ Testimonials

Most people think nostalgia is vague. Sable proves it is specific. Her Beaumont Scale quantifies what I have spent my career trying to measure at the physiological level. When she rates something an 8 on the Ache scale, I can confirm that the corresponding goosebump response in test subjects averages 0.9mm elevation. Our data correlates. That should not surprise me, but it gives me goosebumps. Professionally speaking.

— Dr. Yuki Ren on Sable Beaumont

Professor Thwaite studies nothing in particular. I study studies about studies. By any reasonable metric, her work should not qualify as research. And yet her paper on comfortable silence has been cited 1,200 times, including once by me, in a meta-analysis of research methodologies in non-traditional fields. Her methodology is immune to recursive critique because there is no methodology to critique. It simply observes. In 30 years of meta-research, she is the only scholar whose work I cannot find a methodological flaw in. This is either because her work is perfect or because it is nothing. I am studying which.

— Dr. Vivienne Chartwell on Professor Millicent Thwaite