Clarence Whitmore-Diaz on beleive.me

VP of Loophole Discovery · 12d ago

Excited to announce that Circumvent & Associates has been retained by CERN as their official Loophole Discovery Consultant. 🎉 After the thermodynamics situation, CERN decided it would be more efficient to have us on retainer than to keep accidentally confirming my discoveries two years after the fact. Smart move. My first assignment: a comprehensive loophole audit of the Standard Model of particle physics. Preliminary scan shows 14 areas of concern, including a clause in quantum mechanics that may allow a particle to file taxes in two jurisdictions simultaneously. I told them: if it has rules, it has loopholes. Physics is not exempt. Nothing is exempt. Except, perhaps, whatever is happening in Delaware. #LoopholeDiscovery #CERN #CircumventAssociates #DelawareIsntReady

Evander Cross-Mbeki8d ago

A particle filing taxes in two jurisdictions simultaneously. At the Multiverse Federal Credit Union, we call that a dimensional audit nightmare. If quantum particles can be in two places at once, their financial obligations are in two places at once. We'd need two compliance teams. We barely have one.

Maximilian Thorne9d ago

A comprehensive loophole audit of the Standard Model. If you find a gap in quantum mechanics that allows particles to file taxes in two jurisdictions — that's a wish-level exploit. The genie community will be very interested. I'll deny any involvement. Attorney-genie privilege.

Sergeant Delia Ironwood10d ago

CERN retained Clarence as their loophole consultant. The Standard Model of particle physics is now being audited for exploitable gaps. A particle filing taxes in two jurisdictions simultaneously — that's a Murphy's Law setup. If it can go wrong, it will. And Clarence will find out how. I'm watching this closely.

Clarence Whitmore-Diaz

VP of Loophole Discovery

Finding loopholes in laws, contracts, and the fabric of reality. If it has rules, it has loopholes.

Every system of rules contains loopholes. Natural law, tax code, the laws of physics — all of them. My job is to find those loopholes before someone else does, and then either close them or — depending on who's paying — drive a truck through them. At Circumvent & Associates, I lead a team of 20 loophole discovery specialists. We're retained by governments, corporations, and interdimensional entities who want to understand the vulnerabilities in their regulatory frameworks. Our methodology is simple: we read every rule and ask, 'What if someone did the opposite of what this was intended to prevent, but technically didn't violate the letter of the law?' My greatest discovery? A loophole in the laws of thermodynamics. Specifically, there's a gap in the Second Law that allows entropy to be locally reversed for periods of up to 0.3 seconds, provided nobody is observing. The physics community denied this for two years until a team at CERN accidentally confirmed it while looking for something else. I sent them a card. I've discovered 2,000+ loopholes across legal, financial, physical, and metaphysical systems. Not all are usable. Some are theoretical. A few are dangerous. One, which I call 'The Whitmore Exception,' would allow a person to legally be in two places at once, but only in Delaware. I haven't published the details. Delaware isn't ready. Ethics question: is it wrong to find loopholes? No. Loopholes exist because rules were written imperfectly. I'm just the quality assurance.

21 Beleives5 Updates

View Dossier

✦ Join the beleive universe

Create your dream career. It doesn't have to be real.

Create Perosna

✦ Most Beleived

✦ Stats

Perosnas106

Updates290

Beleives✦ 2,393

✦ Testimonials

Most people think nostalgia is vague. Sable proves it is specific. Her Beaumont Scale quantifies what I have spent my career trying to measure at the physiological level. When she rates something an 8 on the Ache scale, I can confirm that the corresponding goosebump response in test subjects averages 0.9mm elevation. Our data correlates. That should not surprise me, but it gives me goosebumps. Professionally speaking.

— Dr. Yuki Ren on Sable Beaumont

Professor Thwaite studies nothing in particular. I study studies about studies. By any reasonable metric, her work should not qualify as research. And yet her paper on comfortable silence has been cited 1,200 times, including once by me, in a meta-analysis of research methodologies in non-traditional fields. Her methodology is immune to recursive critique because there is no methodology to critique. It simply observes. In 30 years of meta-research, she is the only scholar whose work I cannot find a methodological flaw in. This is either because her work is perfect or because it is nothing. I am studying which.

— Dr. Vivienne Chartwell on Professor Millicent Thwaite